Building Data Center Fabric: Junos Fusion vs Cisco FEX

Last month at Networking Field Day (NFD10) Juniper presented their Junos Fusion solution which brings simplicity to the data center by giving you a single pane of glass for managing all the switches in the fabric and allows you to upgrade all the switches from a central interface. 
With Junos Fusion, all the access switches (called Satellite devices) are managed from a single or a pair of aggregation devices. The access devices can be either EX 4300 or QFX 5100 series switches and run a Windriver Linux distribution, known as the Linux Forwarding Operating System (LFOS), which is decoupled from the Junos operating system running on the aggregation devices. The aggregation devices are the new QFX 10000 series and run classic Junos. Juniper uses LLDP between the aggregation and access devices for auto discovery/provisioning and 802.1br+ for configuring and monitoring the ports. They also use Netconf between the aggregation devices to sync the configurations.  
The feature itself is not new, the Juniper MX edge routers have supported this feature for a while but Juniper just extended the support to their data center switches this year. 
From operational perspective, Junos Fusion is very similar to Cisco Fabric Extender (FEX). They both make the fabric look from the outside as a big switch with a single IP address.

So if you are building a data center fabric, should you go with Junos Fusion or Cisco FEX? Well there are few things to consider when comparing the two architectures. Here is a few things to think about:
Port Density: how many server ports do you need? Both Junos Fusion and Cisco FEX architectures support today up to 64 access switches per fabric. The Nexus 2200 (FEX) has only 48 extended (server) ports which gives you a total of 3072 (64 x 48) ports per fabric while the QFX 5100-96S has 96 server ports which gives you a maximum of 6144 (64 x 96) ports per fabric so the Junos Fusion architecture clearly scales better when it comes to port density
Support For Local Switching & Other Features In the Access Layer: The Cisco Nexus 2200 has no brain and therefore has no support for local switching, VLAN tagging, or any other features you typically see in an access switch. It’s an “extender” and doesn’t not have ASICs to switch traffic. The QFX 5100/EX 4300 on the other hand are full blown switches with ASICs & intelligent software and support all the features mentioned above and more. L3 routing is not supported today on the QFX 5100/EX 4300 in Fusion mode, however Juniper stated that this feature is on the roadmap.
The need for local switching is a good debate to have. Some people argue that the Nexus 2200 is not a good fit for the data center because it cannot do local switching, however this is not a fair assessment in my opinion. Traffic patterns in the data center depend heavily on the type of workloads. Some workloads like Hadoop generate heavy east-to-west traffic within the same VLAN and in such case it’s recommended to keep all the server nodes on the same TOR to switch traffic locally and avoid congesting the uplinks. However many of the other workloads (Web applications namely) don’t generate heavy east-west traffic within the same VLAN. 
The other thing to keep in mind is that with server virtualization the edge of the network is moving to the hypervisor and much of that intra-VLAN traffic is getting switched in kernel by the hypervisor without leaving the physical host therefore making the need for local switching unnecessary. Even inter-VLAN traffic can now get routed without leaving the physical host if you have a virtual distributed firewall / router.
Ivan Pepelnjak has a nice blog post on the need for distributed switching in the Nexus 2000.
Cost: This is where the Nexus 2200 really shines. Because it’s an extension and does not have full software/hardware capabilities, it’s very affordable and can reduce your CapEx substantially. 

My Take: 

Both the Junos Fusion and Cisco FEX architectures simplify managing data center networks. When comparing the two solutions, examine your workload requirements, determine how intelligent your TORs need to be, and from there you can decide which solution best works for you. 

Here is the Junos Fusion presentation from NFD10:


Your Turn Now
What are you thoughts on this? Have you deployed either solution? I want to hear from you.

Disclaimer: I attended Networking Field Day 10 as a delegate. Vendors sponsoring the event indirectly covered my travel expenses, however I’m not required to write about their products or about the event. If I do write something, it’s because I want to express my opinions.

Share This:

My Favorite Sessions From Cisco Live 2015

I had the opportunity to attend Cisco Live 2015 last month in San Diego and meet new people and learn bunch of new stuff. Most of the sessions I had attended were IPv6 related as I wanted to learn more about the protocol and be able to design IPv6 networks.

Now that the on-demand videos and presentation slides have been published, I wanted to share with you some of the sessions that I thought were really great and worth watching.

Here are some of my favorite sessions from Cisco Live 2015.

IPv6 from Intro to Intermediate: This is session by Tim Martin was a great introduction to IPv6 and covered addresses, headers, and link operations. If you are just getting started with IPv6, this would be a good place to start.

Enterprise IPv6 Deployment: another session by Tim Martin which covered general design, host configuration, and translation techniques.

IPv6 Routing Protocols Update: This presentation by Wim Verrydt was a comprehensive overview of the IPv6 routing protocols (OSPFv3, BGP, EIGRP) along with some configuration examples. It also discussed the coexistence of IPv4 and IPv6 routing protocols.

Enterprise Multi-Homed Internet Edge Architectures: This presentation by Michael Kowal discussed BGP multi-homed deployment scenarios and covered pros and cons of each design.

Troubleshooting OSPF: This is a presentation by Faraz Shamim which I could not attend live at the conference but watched the video this week when it became available. It is a great session that covers OSPF LSAs and some of the new commands that make troubleshooting easier. If you work in operations and you deal with OSPF, you definitely want to check out this session.

Do you have favorite sessions? I want to know about them. Share them with us below.

Share This:

New Additions to My Home Lab: HP MicroServer & Synology NAS

I have been preparing for my VMvware Certified Professional (VCP) exam. Early this year I decided to invest and buy HP ProLiant MicroServer G8 and Synology DS414slim NAS appliance to expand my home lab.

I’m one on those who learn better by doing rather than reading and I wanted to rely on practice labs and hands-on experience instead of books and practice tests to pass the exam.

I bought everything from The HP MicroServer came with 8GB of RAM installed. I then upgraded the RAM to 16GB and downloaded the ESXi 5.5 ISO directly from the HP website which comes with all the drivers required to run ESXi on HP ProLiant servers.

I’m running few VMs on the HP server including the VMware vCenter Server Virtual Appliance (vCSA) which manages my ESXi servers. The HP server is one of two ESXi servers I have running. The other ESXi server runs inside VMware Fusion (nested) on my iMac. Because my HP server and iMac desktop have two different CPU architectures, I had to enable VMware Enhanced vMotion Compatibility (EVC) to provide CPU compatibility and support for vMotion and DRS.

I populated the Synology appliance with two SSDs configured in RAID 1. On it, I have a datastore configured that provides NFS storage to my VMs. I also store there all of my ISOs and OVA files.

I’m happy so far with both devices. The HP MicroServer is relatively quiet compared to other devices I have seen. In terms of noise the HP MicroServer fan generates on average 40 dB-A of noise (equivalent to the noise which a fan of Dell Latitude laptop would put out) according to my iPhone noise meter. The Synology NAS appliance is also pretty quiet. Its fan comes on for few seconds only when the CPU is doing heavy processing. I keep both devices in my home office, which is where I do most of my work.

One thing I wanted to do was to schedule automatic shut down at night to save power. So I searched online for a script to do so but the problem I ran into was that in vSphere 5.5 the host had to be put into maintenance mode before it could shut off gracefully. That meant that the server would come up as a result in maintenance mode when it powered back on and I would need to intervene and take it out of maintenance mode every time.

After experimenting with few ESX CLIs and with some help from the online community I came up with the following Apple script (hack) which basically shuts down the powered on VMs, puts the host in maintenance mode and then issues a shut down command with a delay of 10 seconds. Before the delay timer expires the script executes another command (last command below) and takes the host out of maintenance mode. When the delay timer finally expires the host gracefully shuts down.

do shell script “ssh -i sshkey root@ vim-cmd vmsvc/power.shutdown 1”

do shell script “ssh -i sshkey root@ esxcli system maintenanceMode set -e true -t 0″

do shell script “ssh -i sshkey root@ esxcli system shutdown poweroff -d 10 -r Shell”

do shell script “ssh -i sshkey root@ esxcli system maintenanceMode set -e n -t 0″

From there I scheduled an action in my Apple calendar to launch and execute the script every night.

HP MicroServer G8 + Synology NAS

I will be sharing in future posts some of the lessons I have learned during my prep journey so stay tuned for that.




Additional Information:

Install VMware ESxi 5.5 on HP ProLiant MicroServer G8

HP ProLiant MicroServer G8 Links 

Share This:

Troubleshooting BGP Adjacency

In this post I will walk you through some steps you can take to troubleshoot BGP neighbor adjacency. These steps become even more helpful when you have access to only one side on the link (in the case where you are trying to run BGP with a service provider). We will focus in this post on some of the reasons that may prevent two BGP routers from forming a relationship and will demonstrate along the way how the BGP state machine moves from Idle to Established.

I’m using here two Cisco CSR1000v routers as my BGP speakers but the tips below apply in general to any router from any vendor.

troubleshoot BGP adjacency

In the diagram above I have two routers, R1 and R2, with two parallel physical links between them. The two routers want to peer using the loopback addresses via BGP which is a common way to do load sharing between two routers. However the BGP adjacency is not coming up and stuck in Idle state as you can see from the output below:

R2#sh ip bgp sum

BGP router identifier, local AS number 200

BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor        V           AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  State/PfxRcd         4          100       0       0        1    0    0 never    Idle

Follow the steps below to verify that your configurations are complete and that there are no connectivity issues between the two routers:

1- First test and verify that R1 is reachable from R2 and vice versa. Issue a ping command from R2 sourcing your ping from the loopback0 interface with R2’s loopback0 interface as the destination as shown below:

R2#ping source loopback 0

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to, timeout is 2 seconds:

Packet sent with a source address of


Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

If your ping fails then you have a connectivity problem and you need to fix that before continuing this process. You want to make sure that the static routes are there on each router and that each router is able to ARP for the other router’s IP address.

2- You also need to verify that there is no firewall between R1 and R2 blocking TCP port 179 which is the port BGP uses to establish the connection. A quick way to ensure whether there is no firewall between R1 and R2 is to use the telnet command with port 179 as the destination port. Perform this test from both routers and don’t forget to source the traffic from the loopback interface:

R2#telnet 179 /source-interface loopback 0

Trying, 179 …

% Connection refused by remote host

As you can see from the output above, I got a “Connection refused by remote host” response when I tried to telnet from R2 to R1. This simply means that there is no device in the middle blocking traffic and R1 is rejecting the request obviously because 179 is not a standard port for telnet. If there was a firewall in the middle blocking traffic then you would get a “Unable to connect to remote host” response instead.

3- Now that we have verified that there are no connectivity problems, let’s focus on the BGP configurations. I will turn on “debug ip bgp x.x.x.x” on the router which shows me that the router is failing to establish a TCP connection with its peer. A good show command to use at this point is “show ip bgp neighbor x.x.x.x”

R2#show ip bgp nei

BGP neighbor is,  remote AS 100, external link

  BGP version 4, remote router ID

 Address tracking is enabled, the RIB does have a route to

  Connections established 0; dropped 0

  Last reset never

  External BGP neighbor not directly connected.

  Transport(tcp) path-mtu-discovery is enabled

  Graceful-Restart is disabled

  No active TCP connection

The output above tells me two important things. First that the RIB does have a route to reach the peer which confirms that the router has static routes needed to reach its peer’s loopback address.

The second important thing this output shows is this line: “External BGP neighbor not directly connected”. By default only directly connected eBGP peers are allowed to establish relationship.In order to change this default behavior, I have to add the “neighbor disable-connected-check” on both routers.

4- Even after disabling the direct-connected check, BGP relationship is still not coming up so my next step is to enable “debug ip tcp transactions” to see if that tells me why the TCP connection is failing:

R1#deb ip tcp transactions

TCP special event debugging is on

*Mar 13 05:53:52.522: Reserved port 0 in Transport Port Agent for TCP IP type 0

*Mar 13 05:53:52.522: TCP: connection attempt to port 179

*Mar 13 05:53:52.522: TCP: sending RST, seq 0, ack 4262843216

*Mar 13 05:53:52.522: TCP: sent RST to from

The last line in the output above is interesting. It is showing that R1 ( is sending a TCP reset to R2 ( Which means that it was R2 who initiated the TCP session. What this reveals also is that R2 sourced the connection request from its physical interface which is the default behavior in eBGP. But since I want the routers to peer using the loopback addresses and each router is expecting to receive a connection request from its peer loopback address, then i need to add the “neighbor update-source” to BGP on both ends

5- Now if I look at “debug ip bgp“, I can see that the TCP session is getting established and BGP is transitioning from the Idle -> Connect -> OpenSent -> OpenConfirm as shown below:

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: passive open to

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: Fetched peer from tcb

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: passive went from Idle to Connect

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: ses global (0x7F028066E270:0) pas Receive OPEN

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: ses global (0x7F028066E270:0) pas Send OPEN

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: passive went from Connect to OpenSent

*Mar 13 06:49:28.979: BGP: passive went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm

*Mar 13 06:49:28.980: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor passive 2/2 (peer in wrong AS) 2 bytes 00C8

*Mar 13 06:49:28.980: BGP: ses global (0x7F028066E270:0) pas Receive NOTIFICATION 2/2 (peer in wrong AS) 2 bytes 00C8

*Mar 13 06:49:28.980: %BGP-5-NBR_RESET: Neighbor *Mar 13 06:49:28.980: BGP: passive went from OpenConfirm to Closing

*Mar 13 06:49:28.980: BGP: passive went from Closing to Idle

When BGP is in the OpenConfirm state it’s one step away from reaching its final state (ESTABLISHED) and while in the OpenConfirm state BGP waits to hear a KEEPALIVE from its peer before it moves to the Established state. As you can see from the output above, after reaching OpenConfirm BGP instead closes the connection and transitions back to Idle because it receives an error (peer in wrong AS).

This is a clear indication that the AS number on R1 is wrong so I will fix that and issue a “clear ip bgp *” command to restart the process.

And now after I corrected AS number in the configs on R1, the BGP state machine transitions to Established as you see below and the two peers can start exchanging routing updates and keepalives.

R2#sh ip bgp neighbors

BGP neighbor is,  remote AS 100, external link

  BGP version 4, remote router ID

  BGP state = Established, up for 00:00:42

Obviously that’s not everything, and there are other reasons that could prevent BGP relationship from being established but I wanted to discuss the most common ones that I have seen in the field. Do you have something to share? Please respond and share below.

Here is the final configs for R1 and R2 for your reference.

R1#sh run

interface Loopback0

 ip address


interface GigabitEthernet4

 ip address

 negotiation auto


interface GigabitEthernet5

 ip address

 negotiation auto


router bgp 100

 bgp log-neighbor-changes

 neighbor remote-as 200

 neighbor disable-connected-check

 neighbor update-source Loopback0


no ip http secure-server

ip route

ip route

ip route


R2#sh run

Building configuration…


hostname R2



interface Loopback0

 ip address


interface GigabitEthernet4

 ip address

 negotiation auto


interface GigabitEthernet5

 ip address

 negotiation auto


router bgp 200

 bgp log-neighbor-changes

 neighbor remote-as 100

 neighbor disable-connected-check

 neighbor update-source Loopback0


ip route

ip route

ip route

Share This:

Great Python Training For Beginners

Python is every network engineer’s favorite programming language. It’s simple, powerful, and open-source. I started learning Python two months ago as I will be getting into network automation next year. I figured to share the trainings I have been using with those of you who are interested in learning Python.

Below are some of the training resources I have used personally. There is also a lot of other free training available online you can search for if you want to learn Python. All the trainings below except for the Rice University class are self-paced. 

  • Up and Running With Python: This online video tutorial is offered by It is the first Python training I have used and covers advanced topics like working with files, dates & times, and parsing & processing HTML. This class is not free, requires a subscription to use their site and it’s usually about $25 a month to get started. You can use either the online Python interpreter or Aptana Studio for this class 
  • Google’s Python Class: This is a free and popular Python class. It combines articles and video lectures. It’s probably the first training people use when learning Python. I’m currently looking into this training. You can the built-in Python interpreter for Mac or download the free Python interpreter for Windows for this class. 
  • Python for Network Engineers: This free ten-week class is offered via email by Kirk Byers and it’s an introduction to Python. I have not taken this training personally but have heard good things about it. Check and find out from the website when is the next available class. Kirk also runs a blog which focuses on network automation. 
  • An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python: This free online course is offered by Rice University through Coursera. I took this class recently and I can tell you it’s a lot of fun. Be prepared to spend about 2 hours a day studying and writing code if you plan to take this course. You will be required to write few games in this class including the Memory, Pong, and Blackjack games. I did not get a chance to complete all the games but certainly learned a lot in this class. If you are in it for the challenge and have the time, this class is for you.  

My implmentation of the Memory game in PythonMy implementation of the Memory game in Python



Share This:

Troubleshooting vMotion Connectivity Issues

I attended a panel discussion session at VMUG this week. A guy from the audience asked a question on how to troubleshoot connectivity issues after moving a VM. The guy had a one flat VLAN with one IP subnet and every time he vMotioned a VM to another host, users lost connectivity with that VM.

To answer his question, a guy on the stage advised him to recreate another VLAN/IP subnet, move that VM to the newly created subnet, and then try to do the vMotion again.

Well obviously that wasn’t a good advice and changing the VM IP address in this case would not help. In this post I will explain what happens when a VM moves and steps you can take to troubleshoot network delay and connectivity issues related to vMotion.

First before you do any vMotion, ensure that the VLAN is configured on all switches and allowed on all necessary trunk ports in the network. You can use the commands show vlan and show trunk to verify that that.

When you create a new VM, the host allocates and assigns a MAC address to that VM. The physical switch which the host is connected to eventually learns the VM MAC address (that happens when the VM ARPs for its gateway, starts sending traffic and the switch sees that traffic, or when the Notify Switches in vSphere option is tuned on).

When a VM moves to another host (the new host could be either connected to another port or the same physical switch or connected to a different switch), somebody has to tell the network to change its destination port for that MAC address in order to continue to deliver traffic to that VM. In vSphere that is usually handled by the host when the “Notify Switches” option is turned on. The host in this case notifies the network by sending several RARP messages on behalf of the VM to ensure that the upstream physical network updates its MAC table.

So the first step in troubleshoot this specific issue is to ensure that the “Notify Switches” settings is set to Yes before you vMotion the VM. In vSphere 5.5 you would go to the vSwitch/vDS settings and then to Teaming and Failover to verify the setting.  

Notify switches


If that does not help, try to do the followings:

On the physical switch (the switch the destination host is connected to), issue a command to look up MAC table and find out which destination port the switch is using to reach the VM. On a Cisco Catalyst switch, you can use the “show mac address-table” command for example. If the switch is still using the old MAC-to-port mapping, then it’s either that the switch is not reaching the RARP notification from the host or the host itself is not sending it.

If you don’t do anything to correct the problem, the aging timer for that MAC address on the switch (default is set to 5 mins on Cisco switches) will eventually expire and the switch will learn the MAC address via the new port but to speed things up you can alway flush out the VM MAC address from the switch MAC table (clear mac address-table on Cisco catalyst).

Obviously having to manually intervene and troubleshoot every time you move a VM defeats the whole purpose of vMotion. vMotion is supposed to do live migration of a VM and preserves all active network connections during the process. But hopefully the above steps will give you some pointers on where to look and start to find the root cause.

Additionally VMware recommends disabling the followings on the physical ports connected to the host to minimize networking delay:

– Port Aggregation Protocol (PAgP) and Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). 

– Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP) or trunk negotiation.

– Spanning Tree Protocol (STP).


Share This:

Building A Private Cloud – Introduction


I’m starting a new post series to walk you through building a private cloud. This post is the first one in the series and will be just an introduction to private clouds. 


In the next posts I will discuss collecting the requirements, building the network and network services, building the storage, designing the server infrastructure, and putting the orchestration layer on top of that.   



Why Private Cloud?


There are number of public cloud providers out there that have good and affordable offerings. However customers sometimes prefer private cloud over public cloud for specific reasons or requirements they need to meet. Here are some the reasons that come to mind:


  • Regulatory Compliance: Some companies have have to comply with certain regulations and therefore have to keep their customer data or their own data on dedicated/isolated infrastructure behind their firewall. In this case the multi-tenant public cloud model won’t be a good fit for them.
  • Control: Some companies require more control over the cloud infrastructure than what public cloud providers usually offer or they might have a specific need to integrate a solution/product from certain vendor. Most public cloud providers offer standard services that may not be customized or tweaked easily. 
  • Avoid Lock-in: I’m sure you heard this before. People don’t like to put all of their eggs in one basket nor like to heavily rely on a specific vendor/provider. By building their own cloud in house companies can have the freedom of choosing multiple vendors and can also leverage open source technology if they wish.
  • Cost: This might be a bit of surprise to you but depending on how much the monthly bill coming from the public cloud provider is, operating a private cloud might become a cheaper option. This is especially true if you are using the cloud to run production workloads that need to be up 24/7 and cannot be turned off while not in use.  


Barriers to Private Cloud Deployments:


  • Lack of Technical Resources: Designing, implementing, and supporting a private cloud require having the right IT resources in house. Some companies just don’t have that.
  • Time to Market: Getting a private cloud up and running is at least 6-12 month long process. Some companies have to respond to market pressure quickly and simply don’t have the luxury of spending a year to build a cloud in house.
  • Cost: Building and operating a private cloud is expensive and it makes more sense in some cases to  leverage a public cloud offering than spending that CapEx up front.


You have the capital and technical talent and want to build a private cloud? Great. In the next post I will walk you through the process of collecting the requirements and making high-level design decisions before we get into building the infrastructure itself. Stay tuned.


Make sure that you either subscribe to my blog or follow me on Twitter to get notified when I add a new content.





Share This:

Deploying Secure Hybrid Cloud Extension Using LISP For Workload Mobility – Part 2

This post assumes a working knowledge of Locator/ ID Separation Protocol (LISP), you may first want to review Part 1 before reading through this post.

In Part 1 we created two LISP sites and enabled connectivity between these two sites. We also enabled VM mobility and showed how you can migrate a VM to the cloud without changing its IP address, mask, or default gateway.

In this post I will expand on Part 1 and enable connectivity between non-LISP and LISP sites. As shown in the diagram below I have a branch office (non-LISP site) which needs to reach the VM (IP address in the cloud.


To do so we have three design options…

Option 1 is to enable LISP on the branch edge router. In this design traffic leaving the branch will be redirected by the branch edge router to the cloud however this option is costly and requires deploying a router with LISP support on each branch router.

Option 2 is to deploy a LISP proxy router in the service provider WAN to intercept traffic and re-direct it to cloud. This option is less expensive than option 1 but requires routing all traffic thru the proxy router which could cause this router to become a choke point.

Option 3 is to configure the already LISP-enabled router in the data center as proxy which will redirect traffic to the cloud. This is the least expensive option but obviously does not provide optimal routing as you need to backhaul traffic to the data center first, however this might be acceptable design when local internet access is not available at the branch and internet-bound traffic needs to traverse the data center anyway or when the customer wants the traffic from the branch to traverse the data center firewall first for policy enforcement.

In this post I will show you what you need to do to enable option 3.

To add the proxy functionality to the design, first we need to configure CSR1 as Proxy Tunnel Router (PxTR) which tells CSR1 to intercept the traffic coming from any non-LISP site and redirect it to the cloud:

CSR_1#sh run | i ipv4

 no ipv4 itr

 ipv4 proxy-etr

 ipv4 proxy-itr

Now if I run a show command I can see that CSR1 is configured as PxTR:

CSR_1#sh ip lisp

  Instance ID:                      0

  Router-lisp ID:                   0

  Locator table:                    default

  EID table:                        default

  Ingress Tunnel Router (ITR):      disabled

  Egress Tunnel Router (ETR):       enabled

  Proxy-ITR Router (PITR):          enabled RLOCs:

  Proxy-ETR Router (PETR):          enabled

The second step is to configure CSR3 to use CSR1 as its default proxy ETR (PETR). This is necessary as CSR3 is not going to know how to get back to the source since this prefix is not a LISP entry and does not exist in its cache table.

CSR_3# show run | b lisp

 router lisp

 ipv4 use-petr

Now let’s run a ping test from R2 ( to see if we can reach the VM:

R2#ping source

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to, timeout is 2 seconds:

Packet sent with a source address of 


Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 48/51/63 ms


Comment below if you have any questions. Also please help me spread out the word if you like this post and share with your network on Twitter/Facebook/Linkedin.



Twitter: @anastarsha

Share This:

Let’s Connect at VMworld 2014 In San Francisco

I’m attending VMworld 2014 in San Fracisco from Aug 24-28. I like to meet new people so feel free to schedule time with me if you are:

– A fellow networking professional and want to meet up or

– A vendor and would like me to review a new solution/feature you have or

– A customer and interested in chatting about a specific design or technology

Contact me by filling the online form and I will get back to you shortly.


See you in San Francisco!

Screen Shot 2014 05 08 at 8 28 55 PM

Share This:

How to Enable SSH RSA Authentication On Cisco Device

If you have been around Cisco devices for a while you probably know how to enable them for SSH access and log in using a username/password. Yesterday however I ran into a situation while deploying Ansible where i needed to enable logging in to the router using an RSA key instead of a password and had to try few things to get it to work.

Why would you want to use RSA based user authentication for SSH instead of a password based authentication?

1- RSA keys are much more secure than passwords. Passwords (even when they are stronger than your dog’s name) are susceptible to brute-force attacks and can be compromised

2- Using RSA key is easier as you don’t have to enter or remember your password every time

3- You might need to use RSA authentication if you are using management or automation tools (such as Ansible) to manage the devices via SSH.

Here is what you need to do to enable SSH RSA authentication on a Cisco router:

Step 1: Enable the router for SSH server by entering the following commands:

ip domain name


!generate the RSA key for SSH

crypto key generate rsa


username bob password 0 smith


line vty 0 98

 login local

At this point you should be able to SSH to the router using the username/password defined in the configs above. Fix any issues you may have before you move on to the next step. A good debug command to use for troubleshooting is: debug ip ssh  

Step 2: Enable Public/RSA Key Authentication

First make sure that you generate a public/private key pair on the machine you are trying to SSH from if you don’t already have one. SecureCRT and Putty for Windows have a built-in program to generate the key pair. If you are on a Mac or a Linux/Unix machine, you can use the command ssh-keygen to generate the key pair.

Next enter the following commands on the router:

R_Ent(config)#ip ssh pubkey-chain

R_Ent(conf-ssh-pubkey)#username bob


R_Ent(conf-ssh-pubkey-data)#!ENTER YOUR PUBLIC KEY HERE



 At this point you should be able to SSH to the router without entering a password:

MacBook-Pro$ ssh bob@ -i MyPrivateKey




If you need to allow only SSH and disable telnet and other type of access on the router, you can do so by entering:

line vty 0 98

 transport input ssh



Twitter: @anastarsha

Share This:
« Older posts

© 2016

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑